FINANCIAL RESULTS OF THE ACTIVITIES OF BUSINESS SUBJECTS UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37000/ebbsl.2023.04.04Keywords:
sustainable developmen, profit, agricultural companies, corporate social responsibility, agrarian busines, profitabilityAbstract
The purpose of the articlesisdetermination of essential signs of sustainable profit as the main result of business and assessment of financial results of business entities of the agrarian sector of the national economy.The scientific novelty-of the received research is in addition to the methodical principles of profit as the main category of business under the conditions of implementation in the practical activity of business entities. The concept of sustainable development is becoming a priority for current and future generations. Under such circumstances, objectiveconditions for creating a financial basis for achieving the goals and objectives of sustainable development of agriculture and rural areas arise. The formation of such a basis is one of the new qualitative characteristics of sustainable profit. The article proves that sustainable profit, in contrast to traditional concepts and methodical approaches to its perception, has a three-dimensional architecture. The architecture of sustainable profit includes: economic dimension, social and environmental dimensions. Corporate social responsibility of agrarian business is considered as one of the main organizational forms of transformation of agrarian enterprises in the direction of ensuring sustainability. It was revealed that the activity of implementing the principles of sustainable development in practical activities is determined by the level of understanding and perception of sustainable values by business and society, as well as by the general corporate culture of agricultural company management.Conclusions.Research has established that the agrarian sector of the Ukrainian economy has a strong margin of strength and profitability. The financial indicators of agricultural enterprises have a positive trend, and the level of profitability of their operation is higher than the average indicators of the national economy. The preservation of the profitability of the agricultural sector during the military conflict in the country emphasizes the strong reserve of strength of agriculture as a type of economic activityand the prerequisites for the restoration of sustainability in the future.References
Courrent J.M., Chasse S., Omri W. Do entrepreneurial smes perform better because they are more responsible? Journal of Business Ethics. 2018. № 153. Р. 317-336.
Masud M.A.K., Nurunnabi M., Bae S.M. The effects of corporate governance on environmental sustainability reporting: Empirical evidence from south asian countries. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility. 2018. № 3. Р. 3.
Hasan I., Kobeissi N., Wang H. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance: The mediating role of productivity. Journal of Business Ethics. 2018. № 149. Р. 671-688.
Leonidou L.C.. Christodoulides P., Kyrgidou L.P., Palihawadana D. Internal drivers and performance consequences of small firm green business strategy: The moderating role of external forces. Journal of Business Ethics. 2017. № 140. Р. 585-606.
Weber O. Corporate sustainability and financial performance of Chinese banks. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 2017. № 8. Р. 358-385.
Partridge D. Capturing the value of sustainability: Identifying the links between sustainability and business value. World Green Building Council. Retrieved from: https://www.worldgbc.org/news-media/links-between-sustainability-business-value-identified-new-ukgbc-report.
Ferrell A., Hao L., Renneboog L. Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics. 2016. № 122(3). Р. 585-606.
OECD Insights. Sustainable Development: Linking Economy, Society, environment. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/
Profit vs sustainability: Reconciling the sustainable transformation myth. Retrieved from: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/06/the-myth-of-profit-vs-sustainability-reconciling-sustainable-transformation/
Arslan M., Kisacik H. The Corporate Sustainability Solution: Triple Bottom Line. The Journal of Accounting and Finance. 2017. № 3-5. P. 18-42.
ElAlfy A., Palaschuk N., El-Bassiouny D., Wilson J., Weber O. Scoping the Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Research in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Era. Sustainability. 2020. № 12. Р. 5544.
Бланк І.О. Управління прибутком. Київ: Ника-Центр, 1998. 544 с.
Хістієва О.В. Якість прибутку та його вплив на сталий розвиток торговельного підприємства: автореф. дис. на здобуття наук. ступеня канд. екон. наук: спец. 08.00.04 – Економіка та управління підприємствами (за видами економічної діяльності). Дон.держ. ун-т. економіки і торгівлі ім. Туган-Барановського. Донецьк, 2006. 26 с.
Турило А.М, Зінчпенко А.О. Аналітико-графічний підхід до вимірювання якості прибутку підприємства. Економіка промисловості. 2009. № 4. С. 171-175. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/econpr_2009_4_28.
Зінченко О.А. Управління якістю фінансового результату підприємства. Економіка та управління підприємствами. 2010. № 1 (103). С. 109-114.
Сільське господарство України. 2022: стат зб. / Держ. служба статистики України. Retrieved from: http://ukrstat.gov.ua
Діяльність підприємств. 2020: стат зб. / Держ. служба статистики України. Retrieved from: http://ukrstat.gov.ua
Pugachev M. Strategic directions of sustainable development of rural areas for the period up to 2030. Official website of the Research Center IAE of Ukraine. 2021. Retrieved from: http://www.iae.org.ua/presscentre/archnews/2912-instytut-ahrarnoyi-ekonomiky-prezentuvav-stratehichni-napryamy-staloho-rozvytku-silskykh-terytoriy-na-period-do-2030-roku.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Irina Kryukova, Veronika Havrilyuk, Kaxnovska Lyudmila

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.