GRAPHIC METHOD IN THE AGRARIAN ENTERPRISES LAND POTENTIAL USE STUDYING
Keywords:
graphical method, combined graphs, land potential, trends in dynamics, indicators of dynamics, reserves for yield growthAbstract
The purpose of the article is to substantiate the use of the graphic method in the study of the agricultural enterprises land potential use.
The scientific novelty is the justification, along with traditional indicators of the efficiency of using the potential of land resources in agricultural enterprises, the use of an indicator of the level of their potential realization, which will comprehensively reflect the achieved level of efficiency in land use and possible reserves by increasing the production of agricultural products. The definition of the concept of land potential is given; potential indicators of the yield of the main agricultural crops are calculated using the example of an agricultural enterprise. In dynamics for 5 years, the indicators of sales volume in volume and value terms, cost of goods sold, productivity of the main agricultural crops: wheat, barley, peas, corn, sunflower in Trofimova LLC were analyzed. Using graphs, an analysis of the dynamics of actual indicators of the efficiency of using the potential of land resources, identifying trends in their dynamics over the years of research and assessing the average annual rate of change is demonstrated. The reserves of growth of indicators of the use of land potential are revealed. To compare the potential and average level of land productivity, using the example of wheat production, it is proposed to use a bar chart. Linear and polynomial trends in grain yield are revealed.
Conclusions. It is proposed to use the combination of two indicators with different units of measurement on the graph as a graphical method in the study of the economic performance of enterprises. Such a graph makes it possible to trace the dependence of the gross grain harvest on the yield of agricultural crops. It is proposed to use combined graphs that allow representing the dynamics of three or more indicators with different units of measurement. It has been substantiated that graphs in scientific economic research allow not only to ensure the clarity of the research results, but also to reveal the reserves for the growth of economic indicators.
References
Пармакли Д.М., Дудогло Т.Д. Графический метод в статистике: учебно-методическое пособие. Комрат. гос. ун-т, Научно-исслед. центр "Прогресс".– Комрат: Б. и., 2017 (Tipogr. "Centrografic"). – 85 p.
Данкевич В.Є. Методологічні та організаційно-економічні основи розвитку земельних відносин. Глобальні та національні проблеми економіки Миколаївський національний університет імені В.О. Сухомлинського. Випуск 10. 2016. С. 70-75. URL: ttp://global-national.in.ua/archive/10-2016/16.pdf
Kwilinski, A., Pajak, K., Halachenko, O., Vasylchak, S., Pushak, Y., & Kuzior, P. (2019). Marketing Tools for Improving Enterprise Performance in the Context of Social and Economic Security of the State: Innovative Approaches to Assessment. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 172-181. http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.4-14
Шевців, Л., & Кілочко, О. (2021). Роль і значення графічних методів у статистичних дослідженнях розвитку економіки. InterConf, (51). URL: https://ojs.ukrlogos.in.ua/index.php/interconf/article/view/11584
Літвінова В.О. Графічні методи дослідження у аналізі рівня конкурентоспроможності продукції . URL: https://bit.ly/3qJ8LkD
Дядик Т. В., Погребняк Л. П. Земельні ресурси − основа виробничого потенціалу аграрних формувань Полтавщини. Агросвіт. 2018. № 3. С. 41– 45.
Пармакли Д.М., Тодорич Л.П., Дудогло Т.Д. Эффективность производства и реализации продукции: современные методы анализа и оценки (учебное пособие). Комратский Государственный университет, Научно-исследовательский центр "Прогресс". – Комрат: Б. и., 2020 (Tipogr. "Centrografic"). – 151 p.
